PETROGRAPHY FOR ASSESSMENT OF MOULDING COMPOUND OF ANCIENT POTTERY


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Ancient ceramics are the valuable artifacts which saves the information about ancient people and their traditions. The process of making pottery is begun with the choosing and preparation of raw clay and temper material and further applying of different techniques (moulding of vessel, decoration etc.) and finally firing. Petrographical analysis of ancient pottery allows to determine the mineralogical composition of ceramic matrix, the features of their technology and to identify the raw mineral sources (Feliu et al. 2004, Papadopoulou et al. 2006, Bastie et al. 2006). Such kind investigations expand the frames of our knowledge about ancient technological traditions in pottery making. The following characteristics could be determined in thin-sections of ceramic shards: nature and features of plastic and aplastic inclusions; textural and optical characteristics of clay matrix; shape, amount and orientation of pores; features of surface treatment, decoration. This information is animportant for understanding of principles of ancient technologies. The different temper materials inside clay matrix such as sand, crushed rocks, organic materials, shells, grog can be identified accurately using petrography. The ceramic structure and characteristics of mineral changes during the firing are indicators of firing temperatures and atmosphere. A distribution of clay particles and porous inside of ceramic matrix is useful for reconstruction of moulding methods. The study of ceramic collection of the same cultural tradition and from the same region using petrography gives the possibility for differentiation of the natural and cultural factors influenced on the choose of raw materials, variations in the ceramic composition and techniques. This method is one the most precise for identification of an import pottery.

About the authors

Marianna Altkseevna Kulkova

Herzen State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: kulkova@mail.ru

candidate of geological and mineralogical sciences, associate professor of the department of «Geology and geoecology»

Herzen State University, St.Petersburg (Russia) 191186St.Petersburg, nab.Moyki 48/12, Russia

References

  1. Rye O.S. 1981. Pottery Thechnology. Priciples and recontruction. Manuals on archaeology. Owen. Taraxacum, Wahington, 148
  2. McGovern P.E. 1989. Ancient Ceramic Technology and Stylistic Changes: Contrasting Studies from Southwest and Southeast Asia. Scientific Analysis In Archaeology and Its Interprethtion, ed. J. Henderson. Oxford Committee for Archaeology, Monograph 19; UCLA Institute of Archaeology, Archaeological Research Tools 5. Oxford: Oxford University. P. 63-81
  3. Feliu, M. J., Edreira, M. C. and Martín, J. 2004. Application of physical-chemical analytical techniques in the study of ancient ceramics. Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 502. P. 241-250
  4. Papadopoulou D.N., Lalia-Kantouri M., Kantiranis N., Stratis J.A. 2006. Thermal and mineralogical contribution to the ancient ceramics and natural clays characterization. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. Vol. 84, No. 1.
  5. Bastie P., Hamelin B., Fiori F., Giuliani A., Giunta G., Rusti- chelli F., Gysens J. 2006. A new method based on hard x-ray diffraction for the investigation of archaeological artifacts. Meas. Sci. Technol. Vol. 17.
  6. Shepard A.O., 1956. Ceramics for archaeologists. Carnegie Inst. Washington, 414 pp.
  7. Matson F.R. 1937. Pottery. Appendix in The Young site: An Archaeological record from Mechigan, by E.F. Greenman. Occasional Contributions. № 6. Ann Arbor. P. 99-124
  8. Peacock, D.P.S. 1968. A Petrological Study of Certain Iron Age Pottery from Western England. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 34. P. 414-427.
  9. Peacock D.P. S.1970. The scientific analysis of ancient ceramics: A review. World Archaeology. Vol. 1(3). P. 375-389
  10. Peacock D.P.S.1982. Pottery of the Roman world: an ethnoarchaeological approach. Longman, London, New York.
  11. Peterson S. E. 2009. Thin-section petrography of Ceramic Materials. INSTAP Archaeological Excavation Manual 2. INSTAP Academic Press Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. P.22
  12. Williams D.F. 1979. A Petrological Examination of Pottery from Thera, in Doumas, ed., P. 507-514.
  13. Rice P.M. 1987. Pottery Analysis. A Sourcebook. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago and London.
  14. Stoltman, J.B. 1989. A Quantitative Approach to the Petrographic Analysis of Ceramic Thin Sections. American Antiquity. 54. P.147-160.
  15. Глушков И.Г. Керамика как исторический источник. - Новосибирск: Издательство Института археологии и этнографии СО РАН, 1996. - 328 с.
  16. Tite M.S., Kilikoglou V., Vekinis G. 2001. Strength, toughness and thermal shock resistance of ancient ceramics, and their influence on thecnological choise. Archaeometry 43, 3. P. 301-324.
  17. Pavia S., Caro S. 2007. Petrographic microscope investigation of mortar and ceramic technologies for the conservation of built heritage. Optics for Arts, Architecture and Archaeology. Vol. 6618
  18. Ashley K. H., Rolland V. L. 1997. Grog-tempered pottery in the Mocama Province. The Florida Anthropologist. Vol. 5, 2. P. 51-65.
  19. Гребенщиков А.В., Деревянко Е.И. Гончарство древних племен Приамурья (начало эпохи раннего железа). - Новосибирск: Изд-во ИАЭТ СО РАН, 2001. - 120 с.
  20. Дубицкая Н.Н. Керамическое производство Белорусского Поднепровья в VIII в. до н.э. - V в. н.э. - Минск, 2002.
  21. Сайко Э.В. Технологическая организация раннеземледельческих культур// Studia Praehistorica. - София., 1982. №7.
  22. Рейхард Л.Е. Коллойдное происхождение киммерийских железных оолитовых руд Таманского полуострова // Минералогические перспективы-2011, - c. 263-264.
  23. Бетехтин А.Г. Минералогия. - Изд.: М. Государственное издательство геологической литературы, 1950.- 956 с.
  24. Rye O. S. 1976. Keeping your temper under control: Materials and the manufacture of Papuan pottery. Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania 11. P.106-137.
  25. Reedy C.L. 2008. Thin-Section Petrography of Stone and Ceramic Cultural Materials, Plymouth, UK
  26. Mioč И. B., Colomban Ph., Sagon G., Stojanović M., Rosić A. 2004: Ochre decor and Cinnabar Residues in Neolithic Pottery from Vinča, Serbia. J. Raman Spectroscopy. 35. P.843-846.
  27. Maniatis Y. 2009. From Mine to Microscope: Advances in the Study of Ancient Technology. The Emergence of Ceramic Technology and its Evolution as Revealed with the use of Scientifi c Techniques. Oxford.
  28. Livingstone Smith A. 2001. Bonfire 2: The Return of Pottery Firing Temperatures. Journal of Archaeological Science. 28, no. 9. P. 991-1003.
  29. Августиник А.И. Керамика. Изд. 2-е, перераб. и доп. - Л.: Стройиздат (Ленингр. отд-ние), 1975. - 592 с.
  30. Жущиховская И.С., Залищак Б.Л. Петрографический метод в изучении дре ней керамики (на материале неолитических средневековых культур Приморья)// Методы естественных наук в археологическом иучении древних производств на Дальнем Востоке СССР. Владивосток, 1986. - c. 55-67.
  31. Velde B. and Druc I.C. 1999. Archaeological Ceramic Materials, Berlin.
  32. Arnold D. E. 1971. Ethnomineralogy of Ticul,Yucat´an potters: Etics and emics. American Antiquity36: 20-40.
  33. Arnold D. E. 1972. Mineralogical analyses of ceramic materials from Quinua, Department of Ayacucho, Peru. Archaeometry 14: 93-101
  34. Arnold D. E. 1993. The Ecology of Ceramic Production in an Andean Community, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  35. Arnold D. E. Neff H. and Bishop R. L. 1991. Compositional analysis and sources of pottery: An ethnoarchaeological approach. American Anthropologist 93: 70-90.
  36. Arnold D. E., Neff H., Bishop R. L. and Glascock M. D. 1999. Testing interpretative assumptions of neutron activation analysis: Contemporary pottery inYucat´an, 1964-1994. In Chilton, E. (ed.),Material Meanings: Critical Approaches to the Interpretations of Material Culture, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 61-84.
  37. Druc I. C. 1996. De la etnograf´ıa hac´ıa la arqueolog´ıa: Aportes de entrevistas con ceramistas deAncash (Per´u) para la caracterizaci´on de la cer´amica prehisp´anica. Bolet´ın del Institut Francaisd’ ´Etudes Andines 25: 17-41.
  38. Gosselain O. P. 1998. Social and technical identity in a clay crystal ball. In Stark, M. T. (ed.), The Archaeology of Social Boundaries, Smithsonian Institution Press,Washington, DC, pp. 78-106.
  39. Costin C. L. 2000. The Use of Ethnoarchaeology for the Archaeological Study of Ceramic Production. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 7, No. 4. P.377
  40. Bowser B. J. 1996. Local and regional exchange of ceramic resources in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Paper presented in the session “Ceramic Ecology ‘96’,” 95th Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, San Francisco, CA, November 20-24, 1996.
  41. DeBoer W. R. 1984. The last pottery show: System and sense in ceramic studies. Van der Leeuw, S. E., and Pritchard, A. C. (eds.), The Many Dimensions of Pottery: Ceramics in Archaeology and Anthropology, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Albert Egges van Giffen Instituut voor Prae- en Protohistorie, Cingula VII, Amsterdam.
  42. Neupert M. 2000. Factionalism and clay composition: An ethnoarchaeological example. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. V. 7(3). P.249-272
  43. Bishop R. L., Rands R. L., and Holley G. R. 1982. Ceramic compositional analysis in archaeological perspective. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 5, Academic Press, New York, pp. 275-330.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2015 Kulkova M.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies