“Economy of the Extended Space” as a form of autarky in 1930s Germany and German-Yugoslav relations in 1933–1941

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The economic policy of autarky has consistently been regarded as an appealing alternative to a policy of free trade for developing or isolated states. The autarkic policy pursued by Nazi Germany prior to World War II represents a significant topic of academic interest, particularly in the context of historical analysis. The subject of this study is the concept of “economy of the extended space” as a form of autarky in Germany during the 1930s. Concurrently, the primary focus is on the application of this model to one of the most understudied areas of the Third Reich’s foreign economic interactions, namely German-Yugoslav relations. The relevance of this topic is determined by two key considerations: firstly, the importance of the phenomenon of the existence of a state with limited resources in conditions of isolation; and secondly, the significance of the “Yugoslav factor” in the context of Berlin’s foreign policy during the interwar period. The primary objective of this research is to gain a comprehensive understanding of the “economy of the extended space” that emerged in Nazi Germany and the processes through which European states that were primarily agrarian and not significantly influenced by industrialisation were subjugated to its control. Firstly, it is important to note that the focus of this discussion is on the states of South-Eastern Europe. The Kingdom of Yugoslavia represents a particularly noteworthy example of a successful state in this region. It was a large state with a diverse economy, including a thriving agricultural sector and significant mineral reserves. Additionally, Yugoslavia emerged as an important market for German industrial products, contributing to its economic stability and growth. The author examines the economic situation in Germany in the 1930s, the controversy surrounding supporters and opponents of autarkic policies, and the relationship between Germany and Yugoslavia in the interwar period. The study draws upon a variety of historical sources, including documents from the Political Archive of the German Foreign Ministry in Berlin, reports from Third Reich diplomats published in the collection of diplomatic papers titled “Akten zur deutschen auswärtigen Politik: 1918–1945”, statistical data from Yugoslavia, articles from scholarly journals, collections of speeches and monographs written by German researchers from the 1920s to 1930s, and research works from the latter half of the 20th century on the economics of Nazi Germany. The findings of the study indicated that the relationship between Germany and Yugoslavia was mutually beneficial. Both states were invested in the positive development of the other’s economy. Hitler’s decision to incorporate Yugoslavia into the “economy of the extended space” had several advantages. Firstly, it provided Germany with a reliable source of agricultural products and minerals, situated in close proximity to its territory. Secondly, it enabled Germany to maintain its primary trade relationship with Western countries, while also avoiding a complete reorientation of trade towards South-Eastern European countries.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Alexey V. Mishin

Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Author for correspondence.
Email: futurum2006@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2871-397X

кандидат филологических наук, доцент

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Алексиħ Д. Држава и привреда к Краљевини СХС. Београд, 2010. (На cерб.)
  2. Jyбиларни зборник живота и рада Краљевини СХС. Београд, 1929. (На cерб.)
  3. Залепеев В.Н. Основные направления внешней торговли гитлеровского правительства в канун Второй мировой войны // Вестник Брянского государственного университета. 2015. № 1. С. 111–115.
  4. Мёллер Х. Веймарская республика. Опыт одной незавершенной демократии / пер. с нем. А.В. Дорониной. М., 2010.
  5. Постников А.Г. Проблема экономической подготовки Германии к мировой войне и германо-турецкие экономические отношения в 1933–1939 гг. // Вестник Нижегородского университета им. Н.И. Лобачевского. 2014. № 1 (2). C. 351–358.
  6. Успенский В.А., Юданов А.Ю. Дискуссия об автаркии и Дж.М. Кейнс: все еще актуальная тема? // Историко-экономические исследования. 2017. Т. 18. № 3. С. 488–517.
  7. Aleksiсh D. Drzhava i privreda k Kralyevini SKhS [State and Economy of the Kingdom of SHS]. Beograd, 2010. (In Serb.)
  8. Jybilarni zbornik zhivota i rada Kralyevini SKhS [Anniversary Collection of Life and Work of the Kingdom of SHS]. Beograd, 1929. (In Serb.)
  9. Meller Kh. Veimarskaia respublika. Opyt odnoi nezavershennoi demokratii [The Weimar Republic: Experience of one Unfinished Democracy] / per. s nem. A.V. Doroninoi. Moskva, 2010. (In Russ.)
  10. Postnikov A.G. Problema ekonomicheskoi podgotovki Germanii k mirovoi voine i germane-turetskie ekonomicheskie otnosheniia v 1933–1939 gg. [The Problem of Economic Preparations in Germany to World War II and the German-Turkish Trade and Economic Relations in the Years 1933–1939] // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo [Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University named after N.I. Lobachevsky]. 2014. № 1 (2). S. 351–358. (In Russ.)
  11. Uspenskii V.A., Iudanov A.Iu. Diskussiia ob avtarkii i Dzh.M. Keins: vse eshche aktual‘naia tema? [Is the Debate about the Autarky and J.M. Keynes Still Relevant?] // Istoriko-ekonomicheskie issledovaniia [Historical and Economic Research]. 2017. T. 18. № 3. S. 488–517. (In Russ.)
  12. Zalepeev V.N. Osnovnye napravleniia vneshnei torgovli gitlerovskogo pravitel’stva v kanun Vtoroi mirovoi voiny [The Main Directions of Foreign Trade of the Hitlerite Government on the Eve of World War II] // Vestnik Brianskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Bryansk State University]. 2015. № 1. S. 111–115. (In Russ.)
  13. Akten zur deutschen auswärtigen Politik: 1918–1945. Serie C: 1933–1936. Das Dritte Reich: Die ersten Jahre. 6 Bde. Göttingen, 1971.
  14. Akten zur deutschen auswärtigen Politik: 1918–1945. Serie D: 1937–1945. 8 Bde. Göttingen, 1971.
  15. Autarkie? Berlin, 1932.
  16. Brinkmann C. Gruppenautarkie und Freihandel im südosteuropäischen Raum // Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. 1932. Bd. 36. S. 476–496.
  17. Forstmann A. Der Kampf um den internationalen Handel. Berlin, 1935.
  18. Handels und Schifffahrtsvertrag zwischen dem Deutschen Reich und dem Königreich der Serben, Kroaten und Slowenen // Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt. Jahrgang 1927. Teil II.
  19. Haufsleiter O. Der Gedanke der Autarkie als Leitsatz der auswärtigen Handelspolitik und seine Begründung. Umrisse zur Geschichte einer wirtschaftspolitischen Idee // Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik / Journal of Economics and Statistics. 1923. Vol. 65 (120). № 3. S. 193–210.
  20. Ischboldin B. Der wirtschaftliche Neopanslawismus und seine Bedeutung für Deutschland // Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. 1931. Bd. 33. С. 574–590.
  21. Krizman B. Vanjska politika jugoslavenske države. 1918–1941. Zagreb, 1976.
  22. Kube A. Außenpolitik und “Großraumwirtschaft”. Die deutsche Politik zur wirtschaftlichen Integration Südosteuropas 1933 bis 1939 // Geschichte und Gesellschaft. Sonderheft. 1984. Vol. 10. S. 185–211.
  23. Littlefield F. Germany and Yugoslavia, 1933–1941: the German Сonquest of Yugoslavia. New York, 1988.
  24. Mommsen H. Die verspielte Freiheit. Aufstieg und Untergang der Weimarer Republijk. Berlin, 2018.
  25. Schönfeld R. Deutsche Rohstofficherungspolitik in Jugoslawien 1934–1944 // Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte. 1976. H. 3. S. 215–258.
  26. Schröder H.-J. Der Aufbau der deutschen Hegemonialstellung in Südosteuropa 1933–1936 // Hitler, Deutschland und die Mächte / Hrsg. M. Funke. Düsseldorf, 1976. S. 751–778.
  27. Schröder H.-J. Deutsche Südosteuropapolitik 1929–1936: Zur Kontinuität deutscher Außenpolitik in der Weltwirtschaftskrise // Geschichte und Gesellschaft. 1976. Vol. 2. S. 5–32.
  28. Schröder H.-J. Südosteuropa als “Informal Empire” Deutschlands 1933–1939 Das Beispiel Jugoslawien // Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas. Neue Folge. 1976. Bd. 23. H. 1. С. 757–773.
  29. Schumann W. Aspekte und Hintergründe der Handels- und Wirtschaftspolitik Hitler-Deutschlands gegenüber Jugoslawien // The Third Reich and Yugoslavia 1933–1945 / ed. P. Moraca. Belgrade, 1977. P. 221–239.
  30. Simonić Z. The influence of the German trade policy on economic development in Croatia in the period from the Great Depression to the Second World War // The Third Reich and Yugoslavia 1933–1945 / ed. P. Moraca. Belgrade, 1977. P. 120–140.
  31. Teicher E. Autarkie und Großraumwirtschaft in Deutschland. 1930–1939. München, 1984.
  32. Thamer H.-U. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft unterm Hakenkreuz. 06.04.2005 // Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. URL: https://www.bpb.de/geschichte/nationalsozialismus/dossier-nationalsozialismus/39551/wirtschaft-und-gesellschaft (access date: 27.02.24)
  33. Tormin W. Die Weimarer Republik. Hannover, 1987.
  34. Vöchting F. Vom Welthandel zur Großraumwirtschaft // Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. 1942. Bd. 55. S. 1–33.
  35. Von Frangeš O. Die Donaustaaten Südosteuropas und der deutsche Großwirtschaftsraum // Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. 1941. Bd. 53. H. 2. S. 284–320.
  36. Von Frangeš O. Die sozialökonomische Struktur der jugoslawischen Landwirtschaft. Berlin, 1937.
  37. Wagemann E. Der neue Balkan. Hamburg, 1939.
  38. Wirsing G. und die deutsche Zukunft. Jena, 1932.
  39. Wirtschaft und Rüstung am Vorabend des Zweiten Weltkrieges / Hrsg. F. Forstmeier, H.-E. Volkmann. Düsseldorf, 1975.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences