The сonquest of Syria by Muhammad Ali pasha in 1831–1832 and its influence on Russian-Ottoman relations

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

In the article, the author focuses on one of the most pivotal events of the First Egyptian Crisis (1831–1833), namely the conquest of the Syrian provinces of the Ottoman Empire by the troops of the rebel governor of Egypt, Muhammad Ali Pasha. Additionally, he elucidates the rationale behind the Russian Emperor Nicholas I’s decision to dispatch a contingent of Russian troops in 1833 to assist the Ottoman government in its efforts to safeguard its capital. The aim of this article is to analyse the strategies employed by Muhammad Ali Pasha, the Sublime Porte, and the Russian Empire with regard to Ottoman Syria, a region of key strategic importance during the development of the crisis. The present study demonstrates that the deployment of Egyptian troops to Syria in the spring and summer of 1832 was the pivotal factor in the subsequent course of events. This challenges the dominant view in historiography, which posits that the Russian intervention in the conflict was precipitated by a direct threat of capture of the Ottoman capital by Muhammad Ali Pasha’s troops in December 1832, and that St Petersburg’s plans were limited to the defence of the Asian shore of the Bosphorus. This article, which draws on archival documents and recollections of participants in the events, demonstrates the pivotal role played by Syria in the realisation of Muhammad Ali Pasha’s objective to establish a virtually independent power base. It also elucidates the strategic countermeasures devised by the Russian command with the intention of conducting military operations against the troops of Muhammad Ali in Asia Minor and Syria. Russia’s direct military and diplomatic intervention in the conflict between the Sublime Porte and Muhammad Ali Pasha in 1833 had a significant impact, effectively thwarting the Egyptian governor’s plans and providing the Ottoman government with the necessary time to restore the combat potential of its army. However, the alliance established between Russia and the Ottoman Empire at that time did not progress further due to opposition from Great Britain, France, and Austria.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Dmitry R. Zhantiev

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: zhantiev@iaas.msu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4243-6120
Scopus Author ID: 55587549800
ResearcherId: F-7437-2012

Institute of Asian and African Studies

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Avtobiografiia Aleksandra Osipovicha Diugamelia [The Autobiography of Alexander Osipovich Dugamel] // Russkii arkhiv [Russian Archive]. 1885. Vyp. 4. S. 489–525. (In Russ.)
  2. Bazili K.M. Siriia i Palestina pod turetskim pravitel’stvom v istoricheskom i politicheskom otnosheniiakh [Syria and Palestine Under Turk Dominion in Historical and Political Relation] / podg. teksta i pred. I.M. Smilianskoi. Moskva, 2007. (In Russ.)
  3. Kirillina S.A. Po gosudarevu ukazu i po blagosloveniiu patriarkha: ieromonakh Arsenii na Blizhnem Vostoke [By Order of the Tsar and with the Blessing of the Patriarch: Hieromonk Arseny in the Middle East] // Istoricheskii vestnik [Historical Reporter]. 2023. T. 1. № 46 (191). S. 22–45. (In Russ.)
  4. Kobishchanov T.Iu. “Grecheskii proekt” Ekateriny II i Siriia [The “Greek project” of Catherine II and Syria] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 13. Vostokovedenie [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 13. Oriental Studies]. 2017. № 2. S. 3–25. (In Russ.)
  5. Kudriavtseva E.P. Rossiiskii poslannik v Turtsii A.P. Butenev [The Russian Ambassador to Turkey A.P. Butenev] // Novaya i Novejshaya Istoriya [Modern and Contemporary History]. 2021. № 5. S. 83–93. doi: 10.31857/S013038640015140-2 (In Russ.)
  6. Murav’ev N.N. Turtsiia i Egipet v 1832 i 1833 godakh [Turkey and Egypt in 1832 and 1833]. T. 1–4. Moskva, 1869. (In Russ.)
  7. Russkie na Bosfore v 1833 godu. Iz zapisok N.N. Murav’eva (Karsskogo) [The Russians On the Bosphorus in 1833. From the Notes of N.N. Muravyov (Karsskiy)]. Moskva, 1869. (In Russ.)
  8. Smilianskaia I.M., Velizhev M.B., Smilyanskya E.B. Rossiia v Sredizemnomor’e. Arkhipelagskaia ekspeditsiia Ekateriny Velikoi [Russia in the Mediterranean. The Archipelago’ Expedition of Catherine the Great] / pod obshch. red. E.B. Smilianskoi. Moskva, 2011. (In Russ.)
  9. Surikov K.A. Samyi dolgii vek osmanskogo oruzhiia: transformatsiia tekhnicheskogo obespecheniia sukhoputnoi armii Osmanskoi imperii v khode modernizatsii XIX v. [The Long Century of the Ottoman Weapons: Transformation of the Equipment of the Ottoman Ground Forces during the Modernization of the 19th c.] // Elektronnyj nauchno-obrazovatel’nyj zhurnal “Istoriya” [Electronic scientific and educational Journal “History”]. 2023. № 11 (133). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840028953-7-1/ (access date: 05.07.2024). doi: 10.18254/S207987840028953-7 (In Russ.)
  10. Tri doneseniia A.P. Buteneva grafu Nessel’rode po Egipetskomu delu 1832 i 1833 [Three reports by A.P. Butenev to Count Nesselrode on the Egyptian case in 1832 and 1833] // Russkii arkhiv [Russian Archive]. 1883. Vyp. 1. S. 64–76. (In Russ.)
  11. Vostochnyi vopros vo vneshnei politike Rossii. Konets XVIII – nachalo XX v. [The Eastern Question in Russia’s Foreign Policy. The End of the 18th – the Beginning of the 20th c.] / otv. red. N.S. Kiniapina. Moskva, 1978. (In Russ.)
  12. Hurub Ibrahim Basha al-Misri fi Suriya wa al-Anadul. Geliopolis, 1927.
  13. Rustum A. The Royal Archives of Egypt and the Origins of the Egyptian Expedition to Syria, 1831–1841. Beirut, 1936.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences