Effect of Probiotic Lactobacteria on the Intestinal Microbiota and Morphological and Physiological Indicators of Quail

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The work shows the effect of adding Lactiplantibacillus plantarum AG10 biomass to quail feed. Quails that received a probiotic feed additive for seven weeks showed a significant improvement in such economic indicators as the dynamics of live weight, gutted carcass weight and feed consumption per 1 kg of gain. Using the analysis of libraries of 16S rRNA gene sequences sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform, shifts in the microbiota of the cecum were discovered, which can help improve the morphological and physiological parameters of quails.

Негізгі сөздер

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

E. Gavrilova

Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
Ресей, Kazan, 420008

O. Karaseva

Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
Ресей, Kazan, 420008

Y. Monir

Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
Ресей, Kazan, 420008

A. Ezhkova

Kazan State Academy of Veterinary Medicine named after N.E. Bauman

Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
Ресей, 420061, Kazan

V. Ezhkov

Kazan State Academy of Veterinary Medicine named after N.E. Bauman

Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
Ресей, 420061, Kazan

R. Volkov

Kazan State Academy of Veterinary Medicine named after N.E. Bauman

Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
Ресей, 420061, Kazan

A. Senina

Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
Ресей, Kazan, 420008

D. Khusnutdinova

Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
Ресей, Kazan, 420008

E. Nikitina

Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University; Kazan National Research Technological University

Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
Ресей, Kazan, 420008; Kazan, 420015

D. Yarullina

Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
Ресей, Kazan, 420008

A. Kayumov

Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
Ресей, Kazan, 420008

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Алиев М. Ш., Захаров В. П., Прокофьева Р. Г. Факторы повышения качества продукции и эффективности птицеводства в Республике Татарстан // Ученые записки Казанской государственной академии ветеринарной медицины им. Н. Э. Баумана. 2008. Т. 193. С. 12‒15.
  2. Полонский В. И., Сумина А. В. Влияние физических характеристик зернового сырья на функциональную ценность кормов для птиц // Вестн. Российского университета дружбы народов. Сер. Агрономия и животноводство. 2021. Т. 16. № 2. С. 167‒175.
  3. Путивская Т. Б., Норовяткин В. И. Проект повышения эффективности разведения перепелов // Региональные агросистемы: экономика и социология. 2022. № 3. С. 56‒62.
  4. Beck B. R., Park G. S., Jeong D. Y., Lee Y. H., Im S., Song W. H., Kang J. Multidisciplinary and comparative investigations of potential psychobiotic effects of Lactobacillus strains isolated from newborns and their impact on gut microbiota and ileal transcriptome in a healthy murine model // Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019. V. 9. Art. 269.
  5. Campana R., van Hemert S., Baffone W. Strain-specific probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria and their interference with human intestinal pathogens invasion // Gut Pathogens. 2017. V. 9. Art. 12.
  6. Gavrilova E., Anisimova E., Gabdelkhadieva A., Nikitina E., Vafina A., Yarullina D., Bogachev M., Kayumov A. Newly isolated lactic acid bacteria from silage targeting biofilms of foodborne pathogens during milk fermentation // BMC Microbiol. 2019. V. 19. P. 1‒12.
  7. Hill C., Guarner F., Reid G., Gibson G. R., Merenstein D. J., Pot B., Sanders M E. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic // Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014. V. 11. P. 506–514.
  8. Jha R., Das R., Oak S., Mishra P. Probiotics (direct-fed microbials) in poultry nutrition and their effects on nutrient utilization, growth and laying performance, and gut health: a systematic review // Animals. 2020. V. 10. Art. 1863.
  9. Lozupone C., Lladser M. E., Knights D., Stombaugh J., Knight R. UniFrac: an effective distance metric for microbial community comparison // ISME J. 2011. V. 5. P. 169‒172.
  10. Park Y. H., Hamidon F., Rajangan C., Soh K. P., Gan C. Y., Lim T. S., Abdullah W. N.W., Liong M. T. Application of probiotics for the production of safe and high-quality poultry meat // Korean J. Food Sci. Animal Resour. 2016. V. 36. P. 567‒576.
  11. Pourtorabi E., Farzin F., Seraj A. Effects of genetic and non-genetic factors on body weight and carcass related traits in two strains of Japanese quails // Poultry Sci. J. 2017. V. 5. P. 17‒24.
  12. Stanley D., Hughes R. J., Geier M. S., Moore R. J. Bacteria within the gastrointestinal tract microbiota correlated with improved growth and feed conversion: challenges presented for the identification of performance enhancing probiotic bacteria // Front. Microbiol. 2016. V. 7. Art. 187.
  13. Stojanov S., Berlec A., Štrukelj B. The influence of probiotics on the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in the treatment of obesity and inflammatory bowel disease // Microorganisms. 2020. V. 8. Art. 1715.
  14. Tolnai E., Fauszt P., Fidler G., Pesti-Asboth G., Szilagyi E., Stagel A., Paholcsek M. Nutraceuticals induced changes in the broiler gastrointestinal tract microbiota // MSystems. 2021. V. 6. Art. e01124-20.
  15. Wilkinson N., Hughes R. J., Aspden W. J., Chapman J., Moore R. J., Stanley D. The gastrointestinal tract microbiota of the Japanese quail, Coturnix japonica // Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016. V. 100. P. 4201‒4209.
  16. Zaefarian F., Abdollahi M. R., Cowieson A., Ravindran V. Avian liver: the forgotten organ // Animals (Basel). 2019. V. 9. Art. 63.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Supplement
Жүктеу (98KB)
Метадеректер
3. Fig. 1. The effect of applying L. plantarum AG10 as a probiotic additive to feed on the weight of quails and feed conversion: a – live weight of quails during the experiment; b – mass of gutted carcass at the end of the experiment; c – mass of the muscular stomach at the end of the experiment; d – feed conversion rate (kg of compound feed / kg of live masses) on the 44th day of the experiment (indicated by the arrow in Fig. 1a). * – Significant difference at p < 0.05 in the Mann test‒Whitney.

Жүктеу (112KB)
Метадеректер
4. Fig. 2. The effect of L. plantarum AG10 as a probiotic additive in quail feed on the relative content of taxa: a – at the type level; b – at the family level; c ‒ the presence of bacteria of the Staphylococcaceae, Enterococcoceae and Lactobacillaceae families in the cecum of quails.

Жүктеу (208KB)
Метадеректер
5. Fig. S1. The effect of L. plantarum AG10 as a probiotic additive in quail feed on the biodiversity indices of the microbial community of the cecum: taxonomic diversity indices ((a) – Chao1; (d) – Shannon index; (e) – Simpson index), Faith`s PD phylogenetic diversity index (b) and the number of OTE (in).

Жүктеу (83KB)
Метадеректер
6. Figure S2. The effect of L. plantarum AG10 as a probiotic additive in quail feed on the relative content of taxa ((a) – at the class level; (b) – at the level of detachments; (c) – at the level of genera).

Жүктеу (277KB)
Метадеректер

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024