<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Samara Journal of Science</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Samara Journal of Science</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Самарский научный вестник</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2309-4370</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2782-3016</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">22314</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17816/snv20153214</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">FIRST IMPRESSIONS OF EARLY NEOLITHIC RUSSIAN POTTERY TECHNOLOGY</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Основные характеристики технологии производства керамики раннего неолита России</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Spataro</surname><given-names>Michela</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Спатаро</surname><given-names>Мишела</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Dr , PhD</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор института археологии</p></bio><email>michelaspataro@yahoo.co.uk</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">UCL Institute of Archaeology</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Британский музей</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2015-09-01" publication-format="electronic"><day>01</day><month>09</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO3 (2015)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№3 (2015)</issue-title><fpage>142</fpage><lpage>153</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-03-10"><day>10</day><month>03</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2015, Spataro D.M.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2015, Спатаро М.M.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2015</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Spataro D.M.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Спатаро М.M.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://snv63.ru/2309-4370/article/view/22314">https://snv63.ru/2309-4370/article/view/22314</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Ceramics appeared in southern Russia at about the same time as in southern Europe, at ca. 6000 cal BC, but whilst pottery was introduced into southern Europe, together with plant and animal domesticates, from southwest Asia, early Neolithic pottery in eastern Europe was probably developed locally by hunter-gatherers, or derived from other pre-agricultural societies in northern Eurasia. In this paper, four sherds from four different regions of central and southern Russia are analysed using the same methods previously employed in two large-scale research programmes on early Neolithic pottery from the Adriatic and the central Balkans. The four pots were made with different tempering agents and were generally low-fired, but while they may represent different technological traditions to the southern European pottery, the overall technical quality of the hunter-gatherer pottery is no less developed than that of the early farmers.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Керамика появилась на южной территории современной России примерно в то же время, как на юге Европы, примерно 6000 cal BC. В то время как гончарство вместе с доместикацией животных и растений было привнесено на юг Европы с юго-западной Азии, ранненеолитическая керамическая традиция образовалась локально охотниками и собирателями или была заимствована у других представителей доземледельческого общества Северной Евразии. В данной статье анализируются 4 фрагмента сосудов из четырех разных регионов из центра и юга России, используются методы, которые применялись ранее в двух крупномасштабных исследовательских программах по ранненеолитической керамики из Адриатики и центральной части Балканского полуострова. Четыре сосуда были изготовлены с различными отощителями, но все они - слабого обжига. Несмотря на то, что фрагменты могут представлять разные технологические традиции для южно-европейского гончарства, общее техническое состояние сосудов охотников-собирателей было развито не менее, чем керамика периода раннего земледелия.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>early Neolithic Russia</kwd><kwd>ceramic technology</kwd><kwd>optical microscopy</kwd><kwd>Scanning Electron Microscopy</kwd><kwd>chamotte</kwd><kwd>tempering agents</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>ранний неолит в России</kwd><kwd>технология изготовления керамики</kwd><kwd>оптическая микроскопия</kwd><kwd>растровая электронная микроскопия</kwd><kwd>шамот</kwd><kwd>отощители</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Childe, V. G. 1929. The Danube in Prehistory.Oxford, Clarendon Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Piezonka, H. 2015. Jäger, Fischer, Töpfer: WildbeutergruppenmitfrüherKeramik in Nordosteuropaim 6. und 5. Jahrtausend v. Chr. DeutschesArchäologischesInstitut, Archäologie in Eurasien Band 30. Bonn: Habelt Verlag.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Spataro, M. 2002. The First Farming Communities of the Adriatic: Pottery Production and Circulation in the Early and Middle Neolithic. Società per la Preistoria e Protostoria della Regione Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Quaderno 9. Trieste.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Spataro, M. 2011a. A Comparison of Chemical and Petrographic Analyses of Neolithic Pottery from South-Eastern Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38, 2 (2011): 255-269</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Tite, M.S. and Y. Maniatis. 1975. Examination of ancient pottery using scanning electron microscope. Nature 257 (5222): 122-123.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Maritan, L., Mazzoli, C. and Freestone, I. 2007. Modelling changes in mollusc shell internal microstructure during firing: implications for temperature estimation in shell-bearing pottery. Archaeometry 49(3), 529-541.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T., and Ryan, P.D. 2001. PAST: Palaeontological Statistics software for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1):9pp.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Kulkova, M.A. and Kulkov, A.M. 2015. Investigations of early Neolithic ceramics from eastern Europe by X-Ray microtomography and petrography. Microscopy and Analysis, 17, 7-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Kulkova, M. 2013. unpubl. report. Petrographic analysis of ceramic fragments of the site Zamostje 2 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Spataro M. 2009a. Cultural diversities: the Early Neolithic in the Adriatic region and Central Balkans. A Pottery perspective. In Gheorghiu D. (ed.) Early Farmers, Late Foragers, and Ceramic Traditions: On the Beginning of Pottery in the Near East and Europe, (Chapter 4): 63-86. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Spataro, M. 2009b. The first specialised potters of the Adriatic region: the makers of Neolithic figulina ware. In Forenbaher, S. (ed) A Connecting Sea: Maritime Interaction in Adriatic Prehistory: 59-72. BAR International Series 2037, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Feathers, J.K. and Peacock, E. 2008. Origins and spread of shell-tempered ceramics in the eastern woodlands: conceptual and methodological frameworks for analysis. Southeastern Archaeology 27 (2), (Winter 2008), 286-293.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Feathers, J.K. 2006. Explaining Shell-Tempered Pottery in Prehistoric Eastern North America. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 13, 89-133.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Rice, P.M. 1987. Pottery Analysis, A Sourcebook. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Tite, M.S, Kilikoglou, V and Vekinis, G. 2001. Review article. Strength, toughness and thermal shock resistance of ancient ceramics, and their influence on technological choice. Archaeometry 43(3):301-324.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Schiffer, M.B. and Skibo, J.M. 1987. Theory and Experiment in the Study of Technological Change. Current Anthropology, 28(5): 595-609.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Rye, O.S. 1976. Keeping Your Temper under Control: Material and the Manufacture of Papuan Pottery.Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania 11: 106-137.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Spataro, M. 2011b.Technological uniformity? Early Neolithic ceramics, vessels, cult objects, net weights and daub production in Romania. In Luca, S.A. and Suciu, C. (eds.) The First Neolithic Sites in Central/South-East European Transect: 37-45. BAR, International Series, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Spataro, M. and Meadows, J. 2013. Bringing pottery to life: ceramic temper as a cultural identity. BatovicevZbornik. Diadora, 26/27: 59-75.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Kaiser, T., Franklin, U.M. and Vitali, V. 1986. Pyrotechnology and pottery in the Late Neolithic of the Balkans. In: Olin JS, Blackman MJ (eds) Proceedings of the 24th International Archaeometry Symposium, 85-94. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Tringham R, Brukner B, Kaiser T, Borojević K, Bukvić L, Šteli P, Russell, N, Stevanović M, and Voytek, B. (1992) Excavations at Opovo, 1985-1987: socioeconomic change in the Balkan Neolithic. Journal of Field Archaeology 19(3):351-386.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Spataro, M. 2014. Continuity and change in pottery manufacture between the early and middle Neolithic of Romania. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 6(2), 175-197.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
