Magnetic nanoparticles produced by pulsed laser ablation of thin cobalt films in water

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The possibility of synthesizing nanoparticles by pulsed laser ablation of thin cobalt films in water is shown. The average size of the formed nanoparticles varies in the range of 70–1020 nm depending on the thickness of the ablated film. At film thicknesses less than 35 nm, the size dispersion of the nanoparticles

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

I. Dzhun

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: nesterovvy@my.msu.ru

Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics

Ресей, Moscow, 119991

V. Nesterov

Lomonosov Moscow State University; Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: nesterovvy@my.msu.ru

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Physics

Ресей, Moscow, 119991; Dolgoprudny, 141701

D. Shuleiko

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: nesterovvy@my.msu.ru

Faculty of Physics

Ресей, Moscow, 119991

S. Zabotnov

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: nesterovvy@my.msu.ru

Faculty of Physics

Ресей, Moscow, 119991

D. Presnov

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: nesterovvy@my.msu.ru

Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics

Ресей, Moscow, 119991

Yu. Alekhina

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: nesterovvy@my.msu.ru

Faculty of Physics

Ресей, Moscow, 119991

E. Konstantinova

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: nesterovvy@my.msu.ru

Faculty of Physics

Ресей, Moscow, 119991

N. Perov

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: nesterovvy@my.msu.ru

Faculty of Physics

Ресей, Moscow, 119991

N. Chechenin

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: nesterovvy@my.msu.ru

Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics; Faculty of Physics

Ресей, Moscow, 119991

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Lu A.-H., Salabas E.L., Schüth F. // Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007. V. 46. No. 8. P. 1222.
  2. Long N.V., Yang Y., Teranishi T. et al. // Mater. Des. 2015. V. 86. P. 797.
  3. Liu X.Y., Gao Y.Q., Yang G.W. // Nanoscale. 2016. V. 8. P. 4227.
  4. Alonso-Domínguez D.D., Alvarez-Serrano I.I., Pico M.P. // J. Alloys. Compounds. 2017. V. 695. P. 3239.
  5. Blakemore J.D., Gray H.B., Winkler J.R., Mueller A.M. // ACS Catalysis. 2013. V. 3. No. 11. P. 2497.
  6. Li L.H., Xiao J., Liu P., Yang G.W. // Sci. Reports. 2014. V. 5. Art. No. 9028.
  7. Kunitsyna E.I., Allayarov R.S., Koplak O.V. et al. // ACS Sensors. 2021. V. 6. No. 12. P. 4315.
  8. Abdulwahid F.S., Haider A.J., Al-Musawi S. // Nano Rev. 2022. V. 17. No 11. Art. No. 2230007.
  9. Papis E., Rossi F., M. Raspanti M. et al. // Toxic. Lett. 2009. V. 189. P. 253.
  10. Périgo E.A., Hemery G., Sandre O. et al. // Appl. Phys. Rev. 2015. V. 2. Art. No. 41302.
  11. Ichiyanagi Y., Yamada S. // Polyhedron. 2005. V. 24. P. 2813.
  12. Mehdaoui B., Meffre A., Carrey J. et al. // Adv. Funct. Mat. 2011. V. 21. Art. No. 4573.
  13. Usov N.A., Gubanova E.M., Wei Z.H. // J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020. V. 1439. Art. No. 012044.
  14. Мельников Г.Ю., Лепаловский В.Н., Сафронов А.П. и др. // ФТТ. 2023. Т. 65. № 7. С. 1100; Melnikov G. Yu, Lepalovskij V.N., Safronov A.P. et al. // Phys. Sol. St. 2023. V. 65. No. 7. P. 1100.
  15. Sánchez-López E., Gomes D., Esteruelas G. et al. // Nanomaterials. 2020. V. 10. Art. No. 292.
  16. Bose P., Bid S., Pradhan S.K. et al. // J. Alloys Compounds. 2002. V. 343. P. 192.
  17. Sun S., Murray C.B. // J. Appl. Phys. 1999. V. 85. P. 4325.
  18. Mathur S., Veith M., Sivakov V. et al. // Chem. Vap. Depos. 2002. V. 8. P. 277.
  19. Yin J.S., Wang Z.L. // Nanostruct. Mater. 1999. V. 10. P. 845.
  20. Becker J.A., Schafer R., Festag J.R. et al. // Surf. Rev. Lett. 1996. V. 3. P. 1121.
  21. Kurlyandskaya G.V., Portnov D.S, Beketov I.V. et al. // Bioch. Biophys. Acta. 2017. V. 1861. P. 1494.
  22. Blyakhman F.A., Buznikov N.A., Sklyar T.F. et al. // Sensors. 2018. V. 18. Art. No. 872.
  23. Li X.G., Chiba A., Takahashi S. et al. // Materials. 1997. V. 173. Art. No. 101.
  24. Beketov I.V., Safronov A.P., Medvedev A.I. et al. // AIP Advances. 2012. V. 2. Art. No. 022154.
  25. Курляндская Г.В., Архипов А.В., Бекетов И.В. и др. // ФТТ. 2023. Т. 65. № 6. С. 861; Kurlyandskaya G.V., Arkhipov A.V., Beketov I.V. et al. // Phys. Sol. St. 2023. V. 65. No. 6. P. 861.
  26. Hansen M.F., Vecchio K.S., Parker F.T. et al. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003. V. 82. P. 1574.
  27. Semaltianos N.G., Karczewski G. // ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021. V. 4. P. 6407.
  28. Amendola V., Riello P., Polizzi S. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. 2011. V. 21. P. 18665.
  29. Zhang H., Liang C., Liu J. et al. // Carbon. 2013. V. 55. P. 108.
  30. Franzel L., Bertino M.F., Huba Z.J., Carpenter E.E. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012. V. 261. P. 332.
  31. Amendola V., Scaramuzza S., Carraro F., Cattaruzza E. // J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017. V. 489. P. 18.
  32. Zograf G.P., Zuev D.A., Milichko V.A. // J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2016. V. 741. Art. No. 012119.
  33. Haustrup N., O’Connor G.M. // J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2012. V. 12. No. 11. P. 8656.
  34. Bubb D.M., O’Malley S.M., Schoeffling J. et al. // Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013. V. 565. P. 65.
  35. Scaramuzza S., Zerbetto M., Amendola V. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016. V. 120. No. 17. P. 9453.
  36. Александров В.А. // Междунар. научн. журн. Альтернативная энергетика и экология. 2007. № 11. С. 160.
  37. Matthias E., Reichling M., Siegel J. // Appl. Phys. A. 1994. V. 58. P. 129.
  38. Perminov P.A., Dzhun I.O., Ezhov A.A. et al. // Laser Phys. 2011. V. 21. No. 4. P. 801.
  39. Liang J., Liu W., Li Y. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018. V. 456. P. 482.
  40. Zabotnov S.V., Skobelkina A.V., Kashaev F.V. et al. // Sol. St. Phenom. 2020. V. 312. P. 200.
  41. Петров Ю.И. Кластеры и малые частицы. Москва: Наука, 1986.
  42. Santillán J.M.J., van Raap M.B.F., Zelis P.M. et al. // J. Nanopart. Res. 2015. V. 17. No. 2. Art. No. 86.
  43. Santillán J.M.J., Arboleda D.M., Coral D.F. et al. // ChemPhysChem. 2017. V. 18. No. 9. P. 1192.
  44. Ghaem E.N., Dorranian D., Sari A.H. // Physica E. 2020. V. 115. Art. No. 113670.
  45. Hu S., Meltonc C., Mukherjee D. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014. V. 16. Art. No. 24034.
  46. Zhu H.T., Luo J., Liang J.K. et al. // Physica B. 2008. V. 403. P. 3141.
  47. Makhlouf S.A. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2002. V. 246. P. 184.
  48. Ghaem E.N., Dorranian D., Sari A.H. // Opt. Quantum Electron. 2021. V. 53. Art. No. 36.
  49. Svetlichnyi V.A., Shabalina A.V., Lapin I.N. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018. V. 462. P. 226.
  50. Luna C., del Puerto Morales M., Serna C.J., Vázquez M. // Nanotech. 2003. V. 14. P. 268.
  51. Dutta P., Seehra M.S., Thota S., Kumar J. // J. Phys. Cond. Matter. 2008. V. 20. Art. No. 015218.
  52. Pal A.K., Chaudhuri S., Barua A.K. // J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 1976. V. 9. P. 2261.
  53. Huang H., Zhigilei L.V. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2021. V. 125. No. 24. P. 13413.
  54. Inogamov N.A., Zhakhovsky V.V., Petrov Y.V. et al. // Contrib. Plasma Phys. 2013. V. 53. No. 10. P. 796.
  55. Zhilan L., Xinghai Ch., Jianxiong W. et al. // Mineral. Mag. 2022. V. 6. No. 2. P. 346.
  56. Lei Z., Chen X., Wang J. et al. // Mineral. Mag. 2022. V. 86. No. 2. P. 346.
  57. Wang R.-P., Zhou G.-W. Liu Y.-L. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 2000. V. 61. No. 24. P. 16827.
  58. Gao Y., Qin Y., Dong C., Li G. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014. V. 311. P. 413.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Fig. 1. Photographs of a 1.5 ml test tube with a colloidal solution of MNPs, produced by laser ablation of a 500 nm thick Co film, in (a) the absence and (b) the presence of a magnetic field. Cylindrical washers are permanent magnets.

Жүктеу (147KB)
Метадеректер
3. Fig. 2. SEM micrographs of MNPs produced by laser ablation of 250 nm thick Co films (a), (b) at different magnifications of different areas of the deposited particles.

Жүктеу (230KB)
Метадеректер
4. Fig. 3. Hysteresis loop (a) and EPR spectrum (b) for MNPs obtained by PLA of a 500 nm thick cobalt film.

Жүктеу (149KB)
Метадеректер
5. Fig. 4. Dependences (a) of the average size D and (b) of the standard root-mean-square deviation of the sizes σ of the manufactured MNPs on the thickness t of the Co film used as a target for ablation. The dependences were obtained on the basis of DLS data in colloidal solutions of MNPs.

Жүктеу (124KB)
Метадеректер
6. Fig. 5. Raman spectra of the samples: 1 – initial 250 nm thick Co film before irradiation; 2 – substrate after PLA of 35 nm thick Co film; 3 – MNPs obtained as a result of PLA of 150 nm thick Co film; 4 – Raman spectrum for Co3O4 [55]. ν – wave number, I – intensity of the Stokes component of the Raman signal.

Жүктеу (111KB)
Метадеректер

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024